Social Media and the Ladder of Engagement
Reflecting on my last blog
post, I really got to see how Zurb’s Foundation as well as Twitter’s Bootstrap
were able to use their blog to keep developers updated on the latest
developments on their respective frameworks. However these blogs do not necessarily
give both Foundation and Bootstrap the ability to directly interact and engage
their followers. As a result, I decided to take a closer look into Foundation’s
(by now it should be pretty obvious that I prefer Foundation to Bootstrap!) Twitter
profile to study their approach on social media and to get a feel for their social media strategy. As it turns out, Foundation is fairly active on
Twitter (tweeting roughly 5 to 6 times a day) so there were quite a lot
of tweets to go through. I
particularly wanted to see how Foundation’s tweeting patterns fit into Li and
Bernoff’s Ladder of Engagement.
Throughout the past week of
studying Foundation’s tweets, I found that the majority of their tweets were promoting
the Foundation framework itself. These tweets almost always contained a short
catchy blurb followed by a promotion image or a short video. These tweets also
contain a link to either the Foundation website or the latest blog post on the
Foundation blog.
Going through all these
similar tweets, I’d like to think that Foundation primarily uses these tweets
as a way to raise awareness of their framework to developers across Twitter.
Thinking in terms of Li and Bernoff’s Ladder of Engagement, I believe that
Foundation approaches Twitter from a creator or a conversationalists
perspective. These tweets are meant to inform followers by creating tweets that
contain information on Foundation’s developments. Moreover Foundation also
seeks to promote themselves to developers (especially using eye-catching
promotion images and videos to attract to beginner and amateur developers) that
are on Twitter.
I find it really interesting how followers of Foundation somehow prefer commenting an interacting through these tweets as compared to actually making comments on the blog posts. Now that I think about it more, it actually makes more sense for Foundation to take a more active approach to interact their blog posts through Twitter than on their blog, particularly since it allows them to reach a larger audience. Most importantly, they don't exactly have to put a lot of effort into promoting their blog posts because their followers can do that for them as they retweet and favorite the tweets that they send out so that other people that don't follow Foundation might come across these tweets.
I find it really interesting how followers of Foundation somehow prefer commenting an interacting through these tweets as compared to actually making comments on the blog posts. Now that I think about it more, it actually makes more sense for Foundation to take a more active approach to interact their blog posts through Twitter than on their blog, particularly since it allows them to reach a larger audience. Most importantly, they don't exactly have to put a lot of effort into promoting their blog posts because their followers can do that for them as they retweet and favorite the tweets that they send out so that other people that don't follow Foundation might come across these tweets.
Foundation also tries to take
the conversationalist aspect further with tweets that just contain a simple
statement or a question to stir the discussion amongst their followers. While
it does take some time for followers to eventually respond to these tweets,
Foundation does reply to their followers fairly quickly to answer any questions
or concerns they might have. In addition to stirring up conversations,
Foundation also replies to any tweet that mentions their framework in hopes of
starting a conversation.
Taking a closer look at these
tweets that utilize the conversationalist approach, I’ve discovered how these
tweets are purposely worded so that they are search-engine friendly. Being a
developer, I’ve lost count how many times I’ve turned to twitter solve any
coding problem I might have run into. Utilizing this conversationalist approach
while also making the content of their tweets search-engine friendly enables
Foundation to efficiently engage developers across Twitter. It also gives
developers the chance to connect with each other in hopes of solving each
other’s problems. It most definitely is a faster way to get solutions than posting and waiting for replies on Stack Overflow (http://stackoverflow.com/) or searching hopelessly on Google for solutions, at east that's based on my own experience. In that sense Foundation doesn’t necessarily have to become
the provider of solutions but rather to facilitate the process of finding
solutions while also promoting their own brand at the same time. Quite genius
when you actually think about it, it most certainly makes for efficient online
marketing.
I also found it interesting
how Foundation promotes itself by tweeting about users and big-name companies
that use the Foundation framework to build their websites and web-based applications.
By doing this, these tweets by Foundation most certainly add a lot of emotional
appeal to users that are new to the whole concept of responsive web design as
well as developers that are trying to decide on a responsive framework.
While these tweets are a
great way to generate conversations amongst Foundation and their followers, it
also enables to fulfil the critic role as highlighted in Li and Bernoff’s
Ladder of Engagement. By commenting and contributing on Twitter about the users
that utilize the Foundation framework, they in turn are able to generate
interest by highlight what they can potentially accomplish using the Foundation
framework. These tweets also have the potential to generate conversations as
well as the chance for Foundation to connect with their user base. Once again,
these tweets also enable Foundation to promote their own brand at the same
time.
Based on the week’s worth of
tweets that I studied, it is pretty obvious that Foundation seeks to gain a
more personal approach in a way their blog never could. The great thing about
twitter when you think from the perspective of Foundation is that it gives them
the opportunity to effectively connect with their user base. This instant
interaction allows Foundation to truly understand the needs of their users so
that they can tweak their product base to meet the demands. This is essentially
the whole purpose of the Ladder of Engagement that Li and Bernoff discussed.
The whole ladder concept is
meant to allow users of social media to understand their users in order to meet
their marketing goals. The Ladder of Engagement also enables users of social
media to identify their target audience as well as to find ways to enter new
markets. That could be why Foundation’s tweets cover such a broad mix of topics
from the shortcuts of Foundation, general web programming tips, to even career
advice in the field of web development. By being creators, critics, and
conversationalists, Foundation is able to approach Twitter to accomplish their
goal of keeping users updated by being directly connected to them. At the same
time, these roles enable Foundation to find chances to grow their customer
base.
While the Foundation blog and
their Twitter platform do seem unique, I’d like to think that they actually
work hand in hand. The Foundation blog gives followers a broad and general idea
of what Foundation is all about. Twitter on the other hand makes up the blog’s
shortcomings by giving Foundation the chance to connect individually with their
users. In that sense, both Foundation’s blog and its Twitter profile help
fulfil functions of the Ladder of Engagement.
Just something random that a realized as I was ending this blog post. While it was my supervisor at work that got me into learning and using the Foundation framework, I actually first learnt about the framework from a friend of mine back home that tweeted something about how he started to use the framework and how much he loved it. Even though this tweet wasn't from Foundation, I'd like to think that the community that they have built through Twitter has helped them reach larger crowds of people. I guess this really highlights how useful the Ladder of Engagement can be when used effectively.
Just something random that a realized as I was ending this blog post. While it was my supervisor at work that got me into learning and using the Foundation framework, I actually first learnt about the framework from a friend of mine back home that tweeted something about how he started to use the framework and how much he loved it. Even though this tweet wasn't from Foundation, I'd like to think that the community that they have built through Twitter has helped them reach larger crowds of people. I guess this really highlights how useful the Ladder of Engagement can be when used effectively.
Foundation's Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/ZURBfoundation